Oh how quaint...vermin and their propaganda

In light of the upcoming movie "Kick Ass" which has a focus on RLSH related activities I thought I'd talk about something that needs a bit of clarity, that being the issue of RLSH patrols. It seems that one of the main things bugging groups like ROACH (aside from them being intrinsically obnoxious) and other anti RLSH is that they think the RLSH patrols consist of RLSH acting like thugs and going out with the sole purpose of willingly inflicting harm on people. Now having several friends and contacts within the RLSH community this little old mouse would suggest to the casual observer uneducated about the RLSH and this aspect of their movement to see beyond this propaganda. Now that is not to say that some RLSH elements are a little too "wired" for their own good and not all members are conducive to moving the RLSH forward in a positive manner. Society is full of people that project moral values and ethical standards to our faces but then do the opposite behind our backs. We tend to place people on higher ground, pedestals of iconic worship. So when some of these people go bad it is often a shock to us - dirty cops, priests admitting to molestation charges, soldiers killing innocent civilians in fits of rage of frustration, politiicians and their backroom sleazy deals, ect. These are the people that we entrust to uphold our morality and stand as a beacon of hope, a template for us to supposedly emulate. What I find rather ridiculous and hypocritical is that groups like ROACH and RLSH bashers distorts the facts so willingly in order to push their agenda which they have built on a foundation of fallacy. So here is the truth...

When the average RLSH goes on patrol I see little difference between them and a citizens watch group going on a neighborhood patrol (well except for the gaudy wardrobe). Most RLSH patrols consist of people mainly looking out for any potentail trouble and if they see it their reaction is mainly to observe and report unless the threat level is severe enough to warrant interjecting themselves. Case in point as I have made before - if a neighborhood watch group was strolling through their neighborhood and saw a woman kicking and screaming being dragged into a dark alley by an assailant or two would they stay away from the scene and call the cops and wait for them to arrive in order to do something? I highly doubt this. Chances are once the cops arrived at the scene the victim would have been robbed, pysically or/and sexually assualted, or perhaps even dead. If a RLSH patrol came across the same scene chances are they would interjectthemselves and rightfully so - sometimes the mere threat of being seen committing a crime is enough to deter the crime from happening and scaring off the assailants. Would it ethically or morally correct for either the RLSH group or average citizen patrol to wait for the cops to arrive while this crime is being committed? Of course not. Would it be wrong for them to interject themselves in order to perhaps prevent the crime/assault from happening? I would think not, unless they enjoy hearing another human beings screams as they are being brutalized.

So let's clarify and dispel the myth of the RLSH supposedly "looking for trouble".
Yes, the RLSH patrols "look for trouble" but not in the way that assenine organizations like ROACH would like to portray it. RLSH patrols look for trouble as observers - 99% of the ones I've spoken to tell me flat out that their greatest weapon is a cell phone. Why? Because when they see something suspicious they dial
the authorities. Most RLSH don't look for trouble as an excuse to be overtly violent - they understand that because of what they do they may have to defend
themselves as in the example given above. If the assailant who is assualting the woman in question decides to try and attack the RLSH then the RLSH member has every right to defend themselves and incapacitate the attacker with REASONABLE FORCE. Notice I capitalized the words "REASONABLE FORCE"....

Regarding the tragedy of 9/11, we now know that one of the planes that was downed before striking it's target was on a collision course towards the White House. The collision was averted because average citizens refused to sit around and be victims which would result in more victims when the plane collided into its target. We now know that the famous "shoe bomber" was thwarted from his goal by average people on the plane who saw the threat and instead of sitting around and doing nothing, they acted. When I think about the average RLSH patrol I draw some parallels to this. The RLSH who patrol are people who refuse to sit around and watch things go bad around them. Could they do what they do without their costumes? Maybe. However, anonymity is often necessary to accomplish a greater good and to protect ones families, otherwise why would their be a need for spies or undercover police? Do some RLSH act inappropriately sometimes? Undoubtedly so, as do some police officers, politicians, soldiers, and people put in stations for the sole purpose of protecting the system and the citizens within it instead of using their station for illicit purposes and personal gain/glory. It really comes down to arrogance and ignorance from groups like ROACH who bash the RLSH at every turn and yet you have members in their organization declaring war on charity organizations or making statements like children with terminal diseases should be exterminated before they have a chance to grow up, reproduce, and as one ROACH member put it "contaminate the gene pool".

I look at ROACH members and I see a bunch of sloths and pathetic clowns; they hide
behind their villian gimmick and complain about what the RLSH do when they themselves do NOTHING positive / constructive. They bash RLSH patrolling as a dangerous and violent vigilantism but really, is picking up a cell phone and calling the cops "danngerous violent vigilantism"? Is seeing a violent crime and innocent people in harms way and jumping in to deter it the act of a RLSH who is "mentally unstable" or the act of a RLSH who is putting their own safety in harms way to prevent harm to another person? Should we all do what ROACH seems to want us to do and just stand around and do nothing while things unravel in bad ways around us? I hardly think so. Groups like ROACH love to distort what the RLSH do; ROACH thrives on propaganda, lies, and then fall back on their "villian gimmick" when it suits them. This behavior is the stuff of lazy cowards.

The next time a RLSH basher starts spouting off about those "violent RLSH who patrol" take the time to get the facts. See things from both sides of the fence and look beyond the gaudy costumes the RLSH sometimes wear. Talk to a RLSH and ask them why they do what they do and chances are the answers will both surprise and enlighten you. Is the RLSH movement perfect? Absolutely not but the image that ROACH would paint the RLSH as is a fabricated farce, created for their own sick amusement and delusional tunnel-vision.

For more information on how the RLSH generally function, here is a good website to
look into - https://www.rlsh-manual.com/WELCOME.html

Unlike what those idiots in ROACH would have you believe, the manual does not encourage RLSH to "break the law and be vigilantes". It does not encourage RLSH to use excessive violence but rather only the level of violence necessary and only as a last resort. What it does do is provide many links to help the average citizen become more aware of who to contact if they need assistance of any kind, medical information with life saving possibilty (providing CPR, helping people who are choking, diagnosing sypmtoms, ect), the extent of a RLSH legal capacity to carry out their function (essentially what crosses the line and what does not). This manual/website also makes it clear that a RLSH is best served as being an observer and ENCOURAGES RLSH to work with the local law enforcement rather than try to "one up" them. The article is written by a RLSH named Night Owl who in addition to being a RLSH also works in the public safety sector as a fire fighter and EMT intructor. The manual/website also has writings from a RLSH called Superhero, who just happens to be a graduate of the Police Acadamy in Clearwater, Fl. He goes into detail about the legal issues of being a RLSH and offers excellent advice to help a RLSH navigate the legal waters in a way that causes as little problems to local authority as possible. Lastly, for those ass clown ROACH members and RLSH bashers I would pay close heed to the Good Samaritan laws sectionof this manual, particularly the
following:

"Good Samaritan laws (Acts) in the United States and Canada are laws/acts protecting from blame those who choose to aid others who are injured or ill. They are intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death. The name Good Samaritan refers to a parable told by Jesus in the New Testament (Luke 10:33-35).

In other countries (as well as the Canadian province of Quebec), Good Samaritan laws describe a legal requirement for citizens to assist people in distress, unless doing so would put themselves in harm's way. Citizens are often required to, at minimum, call the local emergency number, unless doing so would be harmful, in which case, the authorities should be contacted when the harmful situation has been removed. Such laws currently exist in countries such as Israel, Italy, Japan, France, Belgium, Germany, Andorra, and Spain. The photographers at the scene of Princess Diana's fatal car accident were investigated for violation of the French Good Samaritan law ("non-assistance à personne en danger", or deliberately avoiding providing assistance to endangered persons, can be punished by up to 5 years of jail time and a fine of up to 100 000 €). In Germany, "Unterlassene Hilfeleistung" (neglect of duty to provide assistance) is an offense; a citizen is obliged to provide first aid when necessary and is immune from prosecution if assistance given in good faith turns out to be harmful. Also the helper may not be held responsible if the action he should take in order to help is unacceptable for him and he is unable to act (for example dealing with blood). In Germany, knowledge of first aid is a prerequisite for the granting of a driving license."

So to all you RLSH bashers out there, unless you are too stupid, lazy, or ignorant to do so, spend some time researching before you talk your idiotic smack. Try stepping out of that perpetual fog cloud of narrow mindedness if you have even a sliver of courage in your bodies. But if you insist of continuing to misrepresent the
RLSH movement with your lies and propaganda then so be it. You're already lost the battle - you just either too dumb to know it or to scared to admit it.